In: Acta Radiologica, 64 (2023), Nr. 3. pp. 1038-1046. ISSN 0284-1851 (Druck-Ausg.); 1600-0455 (Online-Ausg.)

Preview

PDF, English - main document Download (1MB) | Terms of use

Abstract

Background Recent studies support magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as a diagnostic tool for pulmonary arterial disease. Purpose To determine MRA image quality and reproducibility, and the dependence of MRA image quality and reproducibility on disease severity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cystic fibrosis (CF). Material and Methods Twenty patients with COPD (mean age 66.5 ± 8.9 years; FEV1% = 42.0 ± 13.3%) and 15 with CF (mean age 29.3 ± 9.3 years; FEV1% = 66.6 ± 15.8%) underwent morpho-functional chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including time-resolved MRA twice one month apart (MRI1, MRI2), and COPD patients underwent non-contrast computed tomography (CT). Image quality was assessed visually using standardized subjective 5-point scales. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured by regions of interest. Disease severity was determined by spirometry, a well-evaluated chest MRI score, and by computational CT emphysema index (EI) for COPD. Results Subjective image quality was diagnostic for all MRA at MRI1 and MRI2 (mean score = 4.7 ± 0.6). CNR and SNR were 4 43.8 ± 8.7 and 50.5 ± 8.7, respectively. Neither image quality score nor CNR or SNR correlated with FEV1% or chest MRI score for COPD and CF (r = 0.239–0.248). CNR and SNR did not change from MRI1 to MRI2 (P = 0.434–0.995). Further, insignificant differences in CNR and SNR between MRA at MRI1 and MRI2 did not correlate with FEV1% nor chest MRI score in COPD and CF (r = −0.238–0.183), nor with EI in COPD (r = 0.100–0.111). Conclusion MRA achieved diagnostic quality in COPD and CF patients and was highly reproducible irrespective of disease severity. This supports MRA as a robust alternative to CT in patients with underlying muco-obstructive lung disease.