Directly to content
  1. Publishing |
  2. Search |
  3. Browse |
  4. Recent items rss |
  5. Open Access |
  6. Jur. Issues |
  7. DeutschClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Influence of surgical approach on component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty

Innmann, Moritz Maximilian ; Streit, Marcus R. ; Kolb, Jeanette ; Heiland, Jochen ; Parsch, Dominik ; Aldinger, Peter R. ; Königshausen, Matthias ; Gotterbarm, Tobias ; Merle, Christian

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16 (2015), Nr. 180. pp. 1-7. ISSN 1471-2474

[thumbnail of 12891_2015_Article_623.pdf]
Preview
PDF, English
Download (589kB) | Lizenz: Creative Commons LizenzvertragInfluence of surgical approach on component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty by Innmann, Moritz Maximilian ; Streit, Marcus R. ; Kolb, Jeanette ; Heiland, Jochen ; Parsch, Dominik ; Aldinger, Peter R. ; Königshausen, Matthias ; Gotterbarm, Tobias ; Merle, Christian underlies the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany

Citation of documents: Please do not cite the URL that is displayed in your browser location input, instead use the DOI, URN or the persistent URL below, as we can guarantee their long-time accessibility.

Abstract

Background: Minimal invasive surgery (MIS) has gained growing popularity in total hip arthroplasty (THA) but concerns exist regarding component malpositioning. The aim of the present study was to evaluate femoral and acetabular component positioning in primary cementless THA comparing a lateral to a MIS anterolateral approach. Methods: We evaluated 6 week postoperative radiographs of 52 hips with a minimal invasive anterolateral approach compared to 54 hips with a standard lateral approach. All hips had received the same type of implant for primary cementless unilateral THA and had a healthy hip contralaterally. Results: Hip offset was equally restored comparing both approaches. No influence of the approach was observed with regard to reconstruction of acetabular offset, femoral offset, vertical placement of the center of rotation, stem alignment and leg length discrepancy. However, with the MIS approach, a significantly higher percentage of cups (38.5 %) was malpositioned compared to the standard approach (16.7 %) (p = 0.022). Conclusions: The MIS anterolateral approach allows for comparable reconstruction of stem position, offset and center of rotation compared to the lateral approach. However, surgeons must be aware of a higher risk of cup malpositioning for inclination and anteversion using the MIS anterolateral approach.

Document type: Article
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume: 16
Number: 180
Publisher: BioMed Central
Place of Publication: London
Date Deposited: 22 Dec 2015 10:20
Date: 2015
ISSN: 1471-2474
Page Range: pp. 1-7
Faculties / Institutes: Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg > Orthopädische Klinik
DDC-classification: 610 Medical sciences Medicine
About | FAQ | Contact | Imprint |
OA-LogoDINI certificate 2013Logo der Open-Archives-Initiative